Arthur Parker (Turlough Convery) and Georgiana Lambe (Crystal Clarke) — a convincingly warmly congenial couple: they act out of kindness to one another, actually talk to one another, support one another — I am sure I am not alone in wishing this Parker brother’s implicit homosexuality had not gotten in the way
The three friends: Alison Parker (Rosie Graham), Charlotte’s younger romantic sister; Charlotte (Rose Williams), once again our grave heroine; and Georgiana, wary, distrustful, somewhat alienated
Dear friends and readers,
Two and one-half years of pandemic later, Andrew Davies’s creation of an experimental Sanditon (alas he wrote the last episode only) returned. It resembles the first (see Episodes 1-4: by the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea; and 5-8: zigzagging into a conclusion in which nothing is concluded) by its use of a too many stories at once, one of which is over-the-top melodrama: centered again in Edward Denham (Jack Fox), Clara Brereton (Lily Sacofsky) as his now discarded pregnant mistress, and Esther (Charlotte Spencer) become Lady Babbington desperate for a child.
An aggressive Esther & vulnerable Clara as enemies at the harsh-mouthed tactless Lady Denham’s (Anne Reid) table
Life is again a matter of pleasures in which all the characters participate: this time it’s a fair or summer festival complete with a contemporary balloon ride dared by Charlotte and the Wickham character of the piece, Colonel Lennox (Tom Weston-Jones), rescued by Arthur (this character is the quiet true hero of this season); another ball, afternoon garden party, complete with archery (in lieu of cricket),
The male rivals: Colborne in front, Lennox to the back
with a sequence of magical dancing between Charlotte caught up, entranced and entrancing, her seemingly Rochester-like employer, Alexander Colborne:
Tom Parker (Kris Marshall) is still irresponsible, getting into debt, now at a loss without Sidney; Mary (Kate Ashfield), his long-suffering prosaic wife turned mother-figure by his side. There is whimsy; many individuals walk or ride along the seashore; too many shirtless men.
Tom Parker confronting Captain Lennox over debt — interestingly, this is a motif from Austen’s draft as continued by Anna Lefroy
But it differs too, most obviously in that several of the central actors & actresses had long since signed other contracts when it seemed there would be no second season. Thus this season the first episode is taken up with grieving for the suddenly dead (in Antigua) Sidney (Theo James), and in the last he (together with Arthur) improbably saves all by proxy when his box arrives, with money (he was always good for that in the previous season) and letters exposing villains: Charles Lockhart [Alexander Vlahos] turns out to be no innocent painter seeking Georgiana’s hand, but the nephew of her white planter-father seeking to replace her as heir. Esther has to appear sans mari (Mark Stanley), so we have to endure a silly gaslight story where Edward steals Babbington’s letters, as he tries to poison Esther so his baby son by Clara can be Lady Denham’s only heir. Diana (Alexandra Roach siphoned off to another series) was no longer catering to and making a hypochondriac out of Arthur, much to the improvement of Arthur.
New men were supplied: a lying soldier, William Carter (Maxim Ays) who Willoughby-like pretends to the poetry-loving Alison he loves and writes poetry when it’s the physically brave and truthful Captain Fraser (Frank Blake) who’s the poet and love-letter writer. Alison is, however, an innocuous boringly innocent Marianne with no serious story about sexual awakening (as has Austen’s heroine).
On the beach during one of the many festive occasions, time out to look at one’s cell phone
I did miss Mr Stringer (Leo Suter) — we hear he is doing well as an architect in London. A mildly comic vicar-type, Rev Hankins (Kevin Elder) and his well-meaning sister-chaperon for Georgiana, Miss Beatrice Hankins, spinster (Sandy McDade) thicken the scenes’ comedy nicely (as in a recipe).
The addition with a sense of weight and original presence is Alexander Colborne (Ben Lloyd-Hughes) — his romance with Charlotte had some convincing darker emotions: years before his wife, Lucy, had left him for London, not liking his tendency to a withdrawn awkward state, and been seduced by the Wickham-Lennox who provides obstacles to Charlotte and Colborne’s relationship in the form of lies (he accused Colborne of what he had done). Guilt and anger and depression keeps him isolating himself from Lucy’s daughter by Lennox (Flora Mitchell as Leonora who dresses up as a boy – some hints at a trans person there), and a resentful niece, Augusta Markam (Eloise Webb).
Charlotte has declared now that Sidney is dead, she has thought the better of marriage and will instead support herself and is hired by Colborne by the end of the first episode to care for and teach his daughters. She brings the whole family out of their obsessive cycles of reproach, self-inflicted frustration and loneliness — by her patience, compassion, inventiveness. This is the over-arching story and along with Arthur and Georgiana’s relationship, it’s the most alive and interesting matter in the season. Here is this pair learning about one another at a picnic:
Charlotte and her employer, Alexander Colbourne reach some understanding
What one can say on behalf of this very commercialized semi-Austen product in itself? First the dialogue and language in general is a cross-between 18th century styled sentences and modern demotic talk and is often witty: e.g, “how we are a stranger to our own affections” says Charlotte. Lady Denham’s way of commenting that no one chooses to be a spinster remains in our minds. The actors had to have worked hard to say lines like this in the natural quick way they do. There is a good deal of successful archness and even irony now and again. Andrew Davies’s concluding episode is the most natural seeming at this.
I very much enjoyed the imitations of story motifs and patterns in Austen’s novels: beyond those already mentioned, Rose Williams has managed to recapture the feel of the heritage Austen heroines: self-sacrifice, earnestness, perceptive behavior combines with a strong sense of selfhood. She is a kind of Elinor Dashwood blended with Elizabeth Bennet; Colborne is a Darcy figure as much as Rochester — at first Charlotte believes Lennox’s lies. Mr Lockhart’s painting Miss Lambe echoes the picture-making in Emma. The picnic again put me in mind of Emma. When Fraser gives Alison a wrapped book as a present and tells her how he values her friendship is a repeat of Edward’s gift of wrapped book to Elinor in Davies’s 2009 Sense and Sensibility so disappointing Elinor with a similar avowal and retreat.
On the other side of the wall, the other characters are listening, hoping for the proposal that finally comes
The worst: the experience is jerky, not smooth, the dialogues at time absurdly short, and as I felt with the previous season (more than 2 years ago), scenes seem not rehearsed or edited enough. I also concede that much that goes on would have horrified Austen as romance material; nevertheless, Clara’s baby out of wedlock can be found central to an off-stage and on-stage stories (e.g., Charlotte Smith’s) in the era; Charlotte Spencer shows her real talent for acting when she is transformed into a such a sweetly gratified mother upon adopting Clara’s baby. Turlough Convery, Rose Williams, Ben Lloyd-Hughes and Charlotte Spencer all provide credible varied depths of feeling to their scenes.
I noticed the film-makers used the same music as in the first season – very cheerful and sprightly and the continuity as well as the well-drawn paratext animation (cut-outs in the old Monty Python style) brings back memories lingering from the previous season.
It was filmed in the same or similar places (Wales, Dyrham Park)
Again the series ended with a cliff-hanger. At the last moment when Charlotte is expecting Colborne to propose at long last, he demurs. We are left to surmise he is afraid he will disappoint her as he did his wife (Lennox needles him as also at fault in the failure of his marriage) but Charlotte is now tired of being batted about (so to speak). She took a lot of punishment from Sidney and now she is being twisted and turned off by Colborne. The sequence goes this way: his older daughter, Augusta, scolds him for not opening up to Miss Heywood and demands Colborne thank Charlotte deeply for all she’s done:
A family once again (and it does not matter that they are not biological father and daughters)
Colborne is to ask Charlotte to stay by marrying her. But when he goes off to propose, Charlotte rejects him. The series overdid this turn and undermined it thematically by having her two months later announce that she is at long last engaged to Ralph Starling (who we heard about as a long-standing suitor back at Willenden).
The sudden new information (from Sidney’s box) that Georgiana’s mother is alive after all and her determination, now that she has been taken in by the Parker family, to find her mother was another obvious bridge: there is an unaccounted for black woman who works for Colborne; she does not behave like an enslaved person. Two people I know said they expect her to turn out to be (what a coincidence! like a fairytale Shakespeare ending) Georgiana’s mother.
Flo Wilson plays the role of Mrs Wheatley (I could not find any stills of her in costume): her last name alludes to the black American 18th century poet, Phillis Wheatley
I will watch Season 3; I even look forward to it. The film-makers are trying to make a sort of Austen sequel-film, a somewhat heritage type criss-crossed by modern behavior and ideas and appropriations. We must forgive them when they pander too obviously now and again: Alison as the princess bride does not do too much harm. It is a series with its heart and mind in the right moral place: any series that can make Turlough Convery, a heavy-set non-macho male who is a superb actor (I’ve seen him as a scary thug, and in Les Miserables he was the most moving of the revolutionaries) the male we most like, admire, and know we can depend on, is worth supporting.
Arthur — the question is, did he really say it was that he was so attracted to Lockhart that he advised Georgiana not to dump him …
Ellen
Chris Brindle’s filmed play: https://reveriesunderthesignofausten.wordpress.com/2017/03/02/a-filmed-play-of-sanditon-by-chris-brindle/
Judith Cheney:
I watched the season opener last night on PBS & I am interested too in the new turns, especially when Charlotte strikes out to be a governess, & after walking out when told she won’t do for the troublesome hands full daughters of Lord ?— , is sought after after all, by his lordship, the cold master & father of the spooky looking house. I loved the touch (literally) of the dog following Charlotte as a sign that she was very much needed in that household. (I think it was the same wonderful actor raggedy Irish wolf? deer? hound who played the sweet stray rescued by Tristan in All the Creatures Great & Small, yes?)
And I was reminded of when the army, & bad boy Wickham & his fellow officers turned up in town in P& P to a social stir & the delight of foolish, flirtatious Lydia Bennet & her friends. (This time in Sanditon Charlotte’s younger sister.) And the scheming Edward Denham is also back, bad penny that he is, conveniently enlisted now & come to plague his step-sister, Esther (who has, as they say has done a 380 – or maybe just a 160 – in her sentiments…..). She is in a precarious situation & while her husband Lord Babbington is away, has to come to see the doctor Tom had brought to Sanditon (who may be a quack but at least is honestly frank with Esther recently arrived back to visit & confide in her Aunt, Lady Denham, still played with dragon-lady meanness by Anne Reid, especially to Charlotte & Edward – & somewhat to Tom, none of whom are any longer intimidated by her. As for Esther, do I see a future heart-breaking death bed scene, à la Melanie Wilkes in GWTW when she tries once too many times for a baby? I surely hope not- I’d like the new ardent Esther to be happy since she seems to have found love (& money).
Mr. Stringer is mentioned as making his way as an architect in London. I miss him already & hope we’ll see him again with his own successes, if not with Charlotte’s hand, which may be held elsewhere in the end. Sydney has disappeared into his Caribbean grave, having gone there after marrying his former wealthy lover for her money to save Tom’s bacon in the building of Sanditon. Tom has, alas, taken out new huge loans & his grand schemes are as precarious are ever. (His wife Mary looks older, white haired & wiser now.) And Sydney may not be so easily be resting in his grave after all, as a packet of papers from Antigua has suddenly arrived. Jane Austen’s plotting is always brilliant (in her very narrow worlds) & has left enough loose strings & clues for Andrew Davies to fashion another season for us – so far in Episode 1. Stay tuned for more to come in Season 2, as I will, even though I agree with Ellen as to some of the lacks from Season 1, with all the cast losses etc. suffered since we left off last episode of Season 1. And whatever will become of Miss Lamb? And Charlotte’s sister & those troublesome daughters of Lord ….? And that gallant Colonel of the Regiment ?
Judith
Pat Honaker: “I really enjoyed Sanditon, looking forward to the next series.”
Evidence for how popular this Sanditon must be: since I put my latest blog on Reveries under the Sign of Austen, I’ve had 660 hits or clicks or whatever it is that word-press counts. That’s enormous for me. When I’ve written a blog that I regard as successful, it’s like 250 or something — the only exception is the Poldark blogs which used to get an astonishing 2000 sometimes. This is beyond the regular subscribers or followers. I am again astonished. I am often astonished at what sells widely. The program does imply woman want to marry and have children more than any other desire they could have.
BTW: my Outlander blogs never get what my Poldark blogs used to — my theory is Outlander types usually do not read blogs like mine. The Poldark books are far more genuine historical fiction. Outlander fans are there for romance fantasies? Poldark readers for validation of their beliefs about love, sex, marriage.
Dorothy Gannon: “Interesting, Ellen (your recent stats). As mentioned, I don’t have a TV, but I am enjoying your Sanditon comments and summaries.”
My reply: Dorothy, one no longer needs a TV to watch such serial programs. If you contribute to your local PBS, you will find all six episodes on Passport on the Internet. I watched the second time through on my PC computer.
Thank you. This was an Austen adaptation two steps away (so to speak), or via motifs both from Austen’s novels as a group and Austen films, but it had enough for me to enjoy.
Ellen
Lest I be misunderstood: I am not for sexing up Austen and am aware that in the first season especially there was a lot of pernicious (I’d say) supposedly light use of sadism and masochism as well just plain soft core porn. This time the film-makers went easier than that, contenting themselves with many shirtless men and being as anti-feminist as possible: this is a world where all women want to do and can do (and it’s fine) is marry and if you don’t have a baby, it’s suicide for you. There is an undercurrent of protest in Charlotte wanting a job, Georgiana saying she would be glad to marry Arthur, and Clara refusing to become all mother. She’d rather go live in peace in a cottage. As long as she has pension.
I protested Devoney Looser’s book and I protest selling Austen through titillating sex: In Jane Austen, women are not either whores or virgins.
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10161657835121124&set=pcb.10161657835701124
The people who read Austen know that such scenes and the thematic implications of them are not there. And her books are still in print and available in good texts — lots of people of course don’t buy books any more. Austen would be horrified. And sequels & films who want respectability usually don’t use this kind of thing for their posters or title signpost. Sanditon advertisement is very careful what they use as their advertising pictures — lots of sadism and masochism in the melodramatic trio of Edward Denham, Clara Brereton and Esther Denham (including wanking Edward on the grass by Clara under duress; Theo James as Sidney Parker exposing himself to Rose Williams as Charlotte Heywood) but you won’t see any of this on the ads. Of course when principles of others sorts too don’t matter any more (I’m talking textual stuff in Austen’s texts) and there are people who will buy the book for the titillating picture and those who will buy a book despite the title or cover picture because they assume it’s meant to sell. Selling is the great criteria for titles and cover illustrations. Startling and attracting as many as possible …
Joe Wright in his 2005 P&P movie turned Austen into D. H. Lawrence — he obviously despised the actual texts, especially the letters in P&P.
I’ve not watched Bridgerton nor read the books. I do have the paper copy and will summarize this later tonight:
https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/sanditon-bridgerton-arts-review-patricia-a-matthew/
If someone could get past the wall, I’d appreciate that. I have a subscription but TLS until recently made it super difficult to read anything on line except through an app
A reply by Nancy Mayer:
“I haven’t watched Bridgerton but did read Julia Quinn’s books. The books are OK as light reading. I didn’t particularly like the first The Duke and I because I thought the Duke’s reluctance to have children to spite the father stupid, considering the father was dead and wouldn’t know whether he had children or not. However, the other first few books of the series were a nice bit of light hearted reading. Pleasant reading with a touch of humor. Nancy”
My reply:
After all, it’s not worth summarizing Patricia A. Matthew — as so many of the TLS articles nowadays there is a conscious attempt to keep too much information and insight out of a text — which most of them are very short nowadays. Also implicitly reactionary as is this one, with its disregard for any historical truth and obedience to pandering to dreams of power, wealth, love &c&c But she does say something in this regard worth remembering the next time you watch one of these “historical period dramas” turned “modern concoction:” it is the very core of such things to be “continually over the top” and at high speed “in every direction all at once” That might be said to be truth to both Bridgerton (which, as I said, I’ve not read or watched) and is too often true of Sanditon. Earlier she says of Sanditon (as critique) it has “taken all of Jane Austen’s cautionary tales.” Surely not all of them, but having even some moral idea this way is apparently not wanted.
She does mention that Sanditon 1 outdid the wet shirt out of the water that Colin Firth became known for by exposing Theo James wholly naked out of the water facing Rose Williams as Charlotte. And she seems to think that the best and most interesting character of Sanditon 2 is Miss Lambe — she is among the pleasanter because of her scenes with Turlough Convery, whose homosexuality as Arthur Parker is not mentioned in this supposedly ever so modern column.
Debased is the true term for these costume dramas and the present TLS
As for the books by Julia Quinn: There are two of you, Nancy. My daughter, Laura, has read the Julia Quinn books. She wrote a review of them for an online publication, mostly about books, called Paste (improbably) and I’ve even
found it.
https://www.pastemagazine.com/books/julia-quinn/bridgerton-season-2-book-changes-julia-quinn/
She does not write about the books themselves, but how they relate to the series — because she wouldn’t be paid for anything else.
Ellen
Vic Sandborn has written a thorough going examination of this second season of Sanditon, much worth your perusal:
https://janeaustensworld.com/2022/05/18/sanditon-season-2-episode-1-a-belated-review/
I particularly recommend not to miss the video at blog’s end where the Arthur character exposes all the falsity of what we are seeing I did distrust the scenes by the sea, and apparently everyone stared at a wall.
I did say this to Vic: You were more irritated than I was, but you did pay more attention to detail My blog is far less worked out: I saw the season as a series of archetypes taken from romance, which ultimately Austen’s were too, only Austen realizes these in a realistic, ironic and critical way — so I tried to ask very little. Austen’s Sanditon, for a start, seems to have been conceived with some understanding of money investments and enormous cheating involved. Her brother Henry’s bankruptcy lies behind this.
Ellen
Dear Ellen, I love your review. I generally don’t read another’s reviews until I finish mine for a season so that I can rely on my own instincts when writing my observations. Forgive me for skimming over the last half of this post when I realized you were discussing the entire 6 episodes. In Sandison S 2’s first episode I saw glimpses of Austen, Georgette Heyer, Charlotte Bronte, and, sadly, pulp romance novels, all neatly tied into one. I’m happy to see that you and I agree on so many points in that early stage.
The first season of Sanditon was disappointing re: Austen’s more mature approach to the story and her original intent, which you so succinctly analyzed, that this season had no way to go but up. Some of the plot developments are outrageous, and, so, yes, I can only review this series sarcastically. I agree that Austen is about romance, but she never writes schlock, which Sanditon a la a Davies production descends into much too often.
I’ll be reviewing Episodes 2&3 together in a few weeks. Let’s hope my pessimistic thoughts about their direction are allayed!
Thank you very much for these warm words of praise. I didn’t realize your blog was on Episode 1 only before I hit send. I was too easy on this
one but glad (I think) that it tried to speak to more humane and enlightened ideas, however lightly; that comes from Davies. You’re right that
as to any of Austen’s real depths, this season has none of it, and the last one only anger not focused well at all. I think I am liking Rose Williams
as an Austen heroine — as I did Anna Maxwell Martin in Death Comes to Pemberley.