A filmed play of Jane Austen and Anna Lefroy’s Sanditon by Chris Brindle

charlottefelicityclare
Charlotte Heywood (Amy Burrows), Felicity Lamb (Bonnie Adair) Clara Brereton (Lucy-Jane Quinlan)

Diana’s letter: [Susan] has been suffering from the headache and six leeches a day for ten days together … convinced on examination the evil lay in her gum, I persuaded her to attack the disorder there. She has accordingly had three teeth drawn, and is decidedly better, but her nerves are a good deal deranged … Jane Austen’s Sanditon

Though he had not the character of a gamester, it was known in certain circles that he occasionally played well, & successfully; to others he was better known as an acute & very useful political agent, the probable reason of his living so much abroad — Of Mr Tracy, Anna Lefroy’s continuation

Dear friends and readers,

Today a friend sent me a news item that the first “period costume drama” of Jane Austen’s unfinished Sanditon is slated to be filmed, in an advertisement that says this is the first filmed Sanditon. Well not so. Chris Brindle’s play from Jane Austen and Anna Lefroy’s Sanditon is, and it’s the argument of this blog it’s probably much more in the spirit of Austen than the coming commercial one.

First, the ad suggests a cosy, creamy film (rather like the recent Love and Freindship), with the completion written by Marie Dobbs. Dobbs turned a satirical and highly sceptical story whose focus is a group of people seeking to make money on the false promises of a seaside spa to cure people, into a melodramatic romance, complete with an abduction, an elopement and three marriages, the accent now on love. Yes box office stars, Holliday Grainger for Charlotte and Max Irons for Sidney Parker have been cast. And much better — reasons for thinking this might be another strong Austen film: the screenplay writer is Simone Reade, who has to his writing credit a fine movie from R. C. Sherriff’s powerful WW1 Journey’s End and the 1997 Prince of Hearts. In addition, the director is Jim O’Hanlon who directed the 2009 Emma scripted by Sandy Welch and starring Romolai Garai and Johnny Lee Miller. And Charlotte Rampling is to play Lady Denham!

Nonetheless, I wanted to recommend not waiting and availing yourself of Chris Brindle’s production of Sanditon, available on DVD from http://www.sanditon.info. I’ve watched it three times now, and went back and reread (as I’ve done before) Anna Lefroy’s continuation, which, together with her aunt’s fragment are the basis for Chris Brindle’s script. It has that Jane Austen quality of telling real truths while leaving you somewhat cheered.

sandition
Shots of the English countryside near the seashore occur between scenes

This interlude between the two acts captures the brightness of the production; the singer is Amy Burrows who plays an appealing Charlotte. She also narrates the good 40 minute documentary available from the site about Anna Lefroy’s life and other writing and relationship with Austen as well as the circumstances surrounding Austen’s writing of Sanditon: Austen, as we all know, was fatally ill knew it, often in bad pain; this was her last piece of writing.


Singers: Amy Burrows and Nigel Thomas (click on the YouTube logo to go over to hear the song)

Brindle is an ancestor of the painter of a miniature of Anna Lefroy, and has interested himself in the landscape, houses, and culture of the era.

First some admission or warning-preparation. The people doing the production had a very small (or no) budget and parts of the play are acted in front a black screen; several of the actors are half-reading the scripts. I found this did not get in my way once I became interested in the play and characters and that was quickly. These parts of the performance reminded of good staged readings I’ve attended.

On the many pluses side: like Catherine Hubback’s Younger Sister (Hubback has also until recently not be a favored subject for the Austen family so that it was hard to get hold of her continuation of The Watsons), Lefroy clearly knows more of the direction Austen meant to take the story in than we can see in the extant text. In her Mary Hamilton she captured something of her aunt’s tone in Persuasion: here she continues the peculiar comic feel combining real hypocrisies, delusions, with a comic control from distancing style. Lefroy’s continuation was not widely known until 1977 when it was published in a good edition and is still ignored, partly because Anna’s close relationship is her aunt is downplayed in favor of Austen’s relationship with the richer Fanny Austen Knight.

mrparkerwantsasurgeon
His carriage overturned, Mr Parker demands that Mr Heywood (Adam Bone) produce a surgeon ….

In the film, the parts are very well-acted, especially of the key figures, Mr [now given the first name of] Tom Parker (Vincent Webb) and Lady Denham (Barbara Rudall). What Lefroy did was to bring out the implications of her aunt’s story: Parker is fringe gentry desperately trying to make money to support his gentleman’s lifestyle, overspending to make an impression, a physician-chaser (he deliberately allows his carriage to overturn where he thinks he will meet with a physician whom he can bring to Sanditon to allure the sick into believing the spa will cure them. For Mr Parker, there is just enough lightness of humor to make them sympathetic figures, without overlooking his actual predation, which is however registered by Mrs Parker’s querulous fretting (Bonnie Adair). It’s more than hinted in Austen’s fragment that the sanguine Sidney, the younger brother (played by Pete Ashore), is an intelligent decent man (a sort of Mr Knightley figure) who rescues Parker from bankruptcy. Lefroy’s text adds a villain-friend of Sidney’s, a Mr Tracy (Adam Bone) whom she characterizes in a more worldly way than any of Austen’s heroes: Tracy is rather like one of Trollope’s semi-rakes; he lives high off his rank, cheating just enough on cards and here as a speculator in a local bank, to sluice money off other people; his creditors don’t call his debts in because they keep hoping to be paid in full. Brindle adds further that Tracy also takes advantage of the delusionary conceited Lady Denham (a sort of Lady Catherine de Bourgh figure) to bankrupt her account.

ladydenham

clarabrereton
Lady Denham disdaining Clara Brereton in a scene between egregiously rude dowager and put-upon heroine that repeats across Austen’s oeuvre

This open emphasis on money as the girding understructure of the society is matched by a development out of Austen’s text: Clara Brereton (Lucy-Jane Quinlan) is a paid companion to Lady Denham, who exploits and bullies her; she is also being seduced by Sir Edward Denham, Lady Denham’s nephew. They have to hide this from her and Austen’s text ends with Charlotte spying them seated on a bench where Clara looks very distressed. In Austen’s text Denham is an admirer of Richardson’s Lovelace, and Clara may be seen as a short version of the name Clarissa. Brindle adds (somewhat improbably) that Denham is pressuring Clara to put some poisonous or sickening compound into Lady Denham’s medicines to do away with the old woman. Brindle has picked up a view of Austen’s Mr William Elliot I have and think may be seen in the 2007 ITV Persuasion (scripted by Simone Burke). Mr Elliot pretends solvency but is actually near broke; that’s why he is hanging around his uncle, Sir Walter and is willing to have a liasion with Mrs Clay to have evidence he can use against her if she should try to marry Sir Walter. Sir Edward Denham is in type a Mr Elliot: a really bad man, desperate for money. I found it an ambiguous feel was given this simple characterization when the same actor played both the good man (Sidney) and the bad one (Denham): Pete Ashore. The choices for doubling are effective: the simple good Mr Heywood, the smooth calculating crook Tracy: Adam Bone.

comicanguish
Diana’s anguish (wildly antipathetic comedy found more in Austen’s letters & juvenilia) is counter-checked by the clarity of Alice Osmanski’s delivery

arthurnearby
Arthur (Rickey Kettly-Prentice) nearby reacts

The best scenes though are those which don’t forward the plot directly. One set are those given where we have just Alice Osmanski as Diana Parker talking out Diana’s inimitable letters or place in dialogue with the Parkers, Charlotte and different configurations of the other characters. She was brilliant, vivacious, half-mad and well-meaning all at once. Rickey Kettly-Prentice is too thin for Arthur, but otherwise utterly convincing as this falsely hypochondriacal young man who finds he does not have to work for a living. Working for money in Austen’s novels is presented positively again and again, but Arthur is the first male to himself almost self-consciously enact a drone role.

misslambtellingclaraherhistory
Miss Lamb’s hard face while she tells Clara her history

The other are those where the plight or hard circumstances of young women without money or status are made central: the characters who carry this are Charlotte Heywood (not brought out clearly in Austen’s fragment because as yet she is not sought by Sidney Parker), Clara Brereton and Miss Lamb, her given the ironic first name of Felicity. Austen tells us only that she is a “mulatto,” very rich, brought by a governess along with a few other girls in a seminary arrangement to spend time at the seashore. Brindle has her tell a story to Charlotte and Clara that reminds me of the story of in the 1808 anonymous epistolary novel, The Woman of Color. Felicity is the daughter of a slave-mistress of her father, both badly treated by the man, with strong suggestions that she was sexually abused by Lamb at age nine. Fittingly for Austen’s fragment, Brindle has disease (a factor in the West Indies for the English who had not built up immunities) do him in. He loses all his relatives but Felicity, and ends up semi-dependent on her while she is there, and sends her to England in order (in effect) to buy a white husband in order to to produce whiter grandchildren for himself. In her intense conversation with Clara and Charlotte Bonnie Adair as Felicity seethes with anger and hurt and shows no disposition to marry anyone; she wants independence and liberty and the play ends without her having engaged herself to anyone.

denhampressuringclara
Denham pressuring Clara

Brindle also fills in Clara’s story: Lucy-Jane Quinlan speaks with a cockney accent throughout and is given a sort Dickensian deprived background, which is poignant. As it’s understandable that Miss Lamb should not be keen to marry any man, and want to control her money so it’s understandable the portionless Clara should be willing to submit to Edward Denham’s bullying, insults (there are brief moments of this) in order to marry him. It’s her only way to provide for herself she says to Charlotte.

sidneysavingtheday
Sidney saving the day

Telling it this way brings out the undercurrents of melodrama and harsh realities that actuate the crises and character’s hypocrisies. The appeal of the piece, its piquancy, is like poor Susan’s miserably over-medicated existence (appropriately Susan is played by the same actress who plays the hard-worked maid, Daisy, Ruby O’Mara), kept muted most of the time. Susan and Daisy don’t say much: Susan is continually using a handkerchief, writhing quietly; Daisy is kept busy. Only in the moments of exposure — such as when Sidney saves everyone by exposing Tracy (and declares for more building up Sanditon), or Mr Parker finds he must admit he is nearly without funds, and the hysteria of Lady Denham for whom a proposed income of £100 a month or a year is horrifying. Fatal. Otherwise how have a happy ending for Clara. I’m sure Brindle has also read Emma where Jane Fairfax’s happy fate is the result of Lady Churchill’s sudden death.

This is a play and production which does not turn Austen into complacent romance or uncritical social comedy. Not that Simone Reade’s production necessarily will. Brindle says in the documentary he meant to do justice to Anna Lefroy’s continuation, her writing and life relationship with her aunt. He does so. Perhaps the delight or feeling that this is world where there are good people whose strength has not been undermined or twisted by circumstances inheres most in Amy Burrows’s character and performance. She does not seem at all your moralizing exemplary heroine, just someone (as she says) who has been lucky to have kind (if not very rich) parents. She is given several wry choral asides for turns in the story.

anaside
Delivering an aside

Try it, you’ll like it if you give it a chance.

Ellen

Author: ellenandjim

Ellen Moody holds a Ph.D in British Literature and taught in American senior colleges for more than 40 years. Since 2013 she has been teaching older retired people at two Oscher Institutes of Lifelong Learning, one attached to American University (Washington, DC) and other to George Mason University (in Fairfax, Va). She is also a literary scholar with specialties in 18th century literature, translation, early modern and women's studies, film, nineteenth and 20th century literature and of course Trollope. For Trollope she wrote a book on her experiences of reading Trollope on the Internet with others, some more academic style essays, two on film adaptations, the most recent on Trollope's depiction of settler colonialism: "On Inventing a New Country." Here is her website: http://www.jimandellen.org/ellen/ No part of this blog may be reproduced without express permission from the author/blog owner. Linking, on the other hand, is highly encouraged!

17 thoughts on “A filmed play of Jane Austen and Anna Lefroy’s Sanditon by Chris Brindle”

  1. See Anna Lefroy, Sanditon: a continuation, together with “Reminiscences of Aunt Jane,” transcribed, edited and introduced Mary Gaither Marshall. Chicago: Chiron Press, 1963. This text has not received the attention it deserves: Lefroy captures and recreates Austen’s tone again and again in some of the queasy humor. See my review of the Later Manuscripts (below); also my blogs on Lefroy and Austen (also cited below).

    Review of Todd, Janet and Linda Bree, eds. Jane Austen: Later Manuscripts. CambridgeUP, 2008, ECCB (Spring 2013): Online: http://www.jimandellen.org/LaterMses.html

    Anna Lefroy in Austen’s letters and her writing: Reveries Under the Sign of Austen, Two (tag and category Anne Lefroy) : https://reveriesunderthesignofausten.wordpress.com/?s=Anna+Lefroy

    On the original title (if it was The Brothers) we should remember that Henry Austen had gone bankrupt, Edward had lost a huge sum. So this comedy has as its source much irretrievable loss.

  2. Kathleen James-Cavan: How did you acquire your DVD of the Brindle Sanditon, Ellen? It seems to be available through Amazon UK only.

    Me: An Irish friend made a copy of the documentary and play from his DVDs and sent them to me.

    Kathleen: “Looks like it was on vimeo but no longer.”

  3. Thank you so much for your wonderful review. I believe Austen wrote Sanditon without inhibition for her own pleasure, knowing that as she was dying, she would never have to present the manuscript for publication. I believe she left it to inspire others, and for others to complete, thinking specifically of her nephews and nieces. She had proved herself as a great writer and maybe in death she could encourage others to write:- and so it has proved. To produce the above I had to learn to write, cast, direct, produce, film and write music. I went through the Austen and Lefroy manuscripts asking myself what was the purpose of every line, and the developments possible for every character. I realised early on that the drivers for the plot should be the financial relationships between the characters. For example Lefroy’s elaborate history of Clara’s past was surely set up to establish that, should Lady Denham die without leaving a will then Clara would inherit 1/4 of Lady Denham’s estate.

    Originally I wrote a script about the life of Anna Lefroy and her quest to finish Sanditon, and arranged a rehearsed reading with the leading actors from UK touring Austen productions, including Peter Ashmore and the cast of “Two Bit Classics”, but was told frankly that what they cared about was knowing how Sanditon ended. Having heard Austen’s dialogue and characters adopted by those wonderful actors it wasn’t hard to imagine exactly what would happen at any point in the future. The most interesting character developments I put into the 10 minute short film filmed on location at Glemham Hall Suffolk and Walton-On-The-Naze Essex, and the story of Anna Lefroy became the 40 minute documentary. The rest of my temporary completion of Sanditon became a stage play, but we incorporated the 10 minute short film at the appropriate place in the action. In the play I skip ahead 10 years to tell the audience how the resort of Sanditon develops after Sidney believes he has saved the day. I did start writing the detailed story of the intervening years set against the historical events of the first half of the 19th Century that I had researched for my Hampshire books, but wondered whether anybody would be interested.

    I had acquired the Lefroy manuscripts from James Borg and decided to sell them at Sotheby’s last December in the hope that the story of Anna Lefroy might gain new publicity. I’ve just come back from the Sanditon200 Conference at Trinity College Cambridge and was delighted to see the Austen and Lefroy manuscripts side-by-side in the library of King’s College. The paper delivered by Professor Peter Sabor on Lefroy’s Continuation was also a highlight of the conference.

    I will of course circulate your review widely to everybody involved in this project who were all delighted to be included in this project to show that Austen not only wanted to be remembered as a great writer, but one who had encouraged so many others to write, and be creative in media she could only have dreamed about.

    The DVD discs are available on http://www.amazon.co.uk and have gone from there worldwide. The material was all filmed in HD so if you would like a Blu-Ray copy do let me know.

    Chris Brindle
    3rd April 2017
    brindlechris@aol.com

    http://www.ubsdell.com
    http://www.sanditon.info
    http://www.guardianangelsmusical.com

    1. I feel honored that you have written me and confided to me (and whoever reads this blog) the background history of your filmed play. If you have the patience (or interest) I could send you about three URLs on this blog website where I summarize what’s known of LeFroy’s life, argue that Austen and she had a close relationship (much closer at times than the one with Fanny Austen Knight), that another poem beyond the one usually attributed to their relationship refers to Anna. I read Lefroy’s one novel that is redolent of Persuasion. People important to Austen or who knew her or close enough in life are still ignored! I’m thinking of Catherine Anne Hubback who became a Victorian novelist and completed The Watsons as The Younger Sister.

      I have met Peter Sabor a number of times. I’m a member of the Burney society and go to their conferences when I can. I was supposed to go to Jane Austen and the Arts at Plattsburgh a couple of weeks ago now and wrote a paper for it: Ekphrastic patterns in Jane Austen. I was unable to attend. The conference organizer generously read some of it aloud and explained the rest. Sabor was the key note speaker for that conference too. His scholarship takes us into the people around these central “stars” (Burney, Austen).

      I regret that Anna Lefroy’s life is not considered interesting enough you see. I’ve discovered this “catch 22” in my work. I’ve translated the poetry of a Renaissance Italian woman poet, Veronica Gambara — she was once well-known. Well I tried to interest someone in a longer biography but could find no one; the argument in a peer-edited journal about my attempt to publish a translation of one of her longer poems is that’s she’s not known enough. But how can we gain interest for her if you will not publish this?

      I’m delighted you find my blog-review useful and glad it will be circulated. I’m sorry to say I don’t have equipment to play a Blu-Ray. My DVD is a home-made one a friend who lives in the UK did for me so I would be grateful for a professional level DVD if one is available. I have one for the program which accompanied the play too — about Anna and your production. The actress doing that one who also played Charlotte is marvelous.

      We can’t have too many seriously intended films made from Austen’s work which truly illuminate her purposes. That’s what your work does – what was Austen trying to accomplish here, what were her interests. She also composed a great poem in her last week. She wasn’t giving up, there trying to control and speak past her dying.

      I hope you do gain interest for Anna Lefroy. My email is ellen.moody@gmail.com

  4. Rory sent the URLs for the coming commercial Sanditon.

    http://www.fluidityfilms.co.uk/sanditon

    Dear Rory, Thank you for both URLs. I knew this commercial Sanditon film is in the pipeline but it is clearly not like this Lefroy-Brindle which genuinely follows Anna Lefroy’s continuation and I think hers comes as close with as good a intuitive guess on what was to come as one can get. The commercial one will follow the conventional non-thinking Marie Dobbs, which gives us a melodramatic romance turn, through the use the motifs of 21st century into innocuous familial romance as found in film genres. Possibly as creamy as the disappointing Whitman Love and Freindship (Lady Susan utterly misnamed).

    1. SIZE OF CANVAS
      I think maybe the best filmed version of Sanditon will come from a TV studio and will be a mini series historically and factually set in an English seaside resort and made with a much bigger budget than the Fluidity/Goldcrest production. You need much more than 2 hours to make full use of the setting, characters and commercial / financial background that Austen left. Lefroy understood this and was defeated by the size and depth of the canvas Austen left. In my play you will note that I cheated by skipping forward 10 years and having the actors narrate what happened in that time. I would expect to see something substantial from Victoria Fea at ITV and something from BBC Worldwide (at least).

      1. Dear Chris,

        Yes I agree. Although the matter is so different, and we are talking of a series of novels, Winston Graham (Poldark author) has written about how necessary it is for his books to be done in mini-series, which means TV adaptations. He put the failure of a 1996 endeavor to film his eighth novel (Stranger from the Sea) down to the choice of a 2 hour film. Gabaldon (of Outlander fame) writes of how when seeking someone to film her first book, she held out for a mini-series. There is still this prejudice against TV film adaptations in favor of cinema ones (finally because they get a bigger audience).

  5. Very interesting. I will try to get hold of this filmed version, and will be inspired to read Anna Lefroy’s continuation. Ellen, I am late getting to this but am glad you brought to our attention a worthwhile project we might have otherwise missed. Thank goodness for blogs.

    Diane

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.